A diferencia de nuestro país, es común que la prensa escrita en los Estados Unidos respalde públicamente a precandidatos y candidatos. El respaldo se limita a un posicionamiento en la página editorial y no influye en la manera en que los diarios reportan a los candidatos a un cargo. Sin duda una práctica interesante y, en mi opinión, democrática.
Aquí el editorial donde explican su apoyo a Hillary Clinton. Resalto dos párrafos:
It is unfair, especially after seven years of Mr. Bush’s inept leadership, but any Democrat will face tougher questioning about his or her fitness to be commander in chief. Mrs. Clinton has more than cleared that bar, using her years in the Senate well to immerse herself in national security issues, and has won the respect of world leaders and many in the American military. She would be a strong commander in chief.
Domestically, Mrs. Clinton has tackled complex policy issues, sometimes failing. She has shown a willingness to learn and change. Her current proposals on health insurance reflect a clear shift from her first, famously disastrous foray into the issue. She has learned that powerful interests cannot simply be left out of the meetings. She understands that all Americans must be covered — but must be allowed to choose their coverage, including keeping their current plans. Mr. Obama may also be capable of tackling such issues, but we have not yet seen it. Voters have to judge candidates not just on the promise they hold, but also on the here and now.
Aquí el editorial donde explican su apoyo a John McCain. Resalto dos párrafos.
We have strong disagreements with all the Republicans running for president. The leading candidates have no plan for getting American troops out of Iraq. They are too wedded to discredited economic theories and unwilling even now to break with the legacy of President Bush. We disagree with them strongly on what makes a good Supreme Court justice.
Still, there is a choice to be made, and it is an easy one. Senator John McCain of Arizona is the only Republican who promises to end the George Bush style of governing from and on behalf of a small, angry fringe. With a record of working across the aisle to develop sound bipartisan legislation, he would offer a choice to a broader range of Americans than the rest of the Republican field.
3 comentarios:
Pepe, como siempre muy interesante tu nota. A tí y a todos los lectores los invito a participar en una encuesta que subí en mi blog (http://notasalpie.blogspot.com) justamente sobre la primaria demócrata. Después subiré una sobre la republicana.
Saludos,
Fernando.
Mi querido Fer... ya participé en tu encuesta... un abrazo... no diré por quien voté, pero como analista me fui por lo más cercano a la anulación del voto para mantener la imparcialidad...
Muy interesante la nota y el seguimiento que haces a la carrera presidencial en el país del Tío Sam.
Esta nota me cayó como anillo al dedo, escribo una reflexión sobre el liderazgo político contemporáneo y con la nota que publicas y las razones que esgrime el NYT para apoyar a los candidatos; es obvio que la administración Bush construyó la idea de liderazgo en norteamérica, un líder "no Bush", eso sin duda fortalece los Demócratas.
Publicar un comentario